MarkupGenMarkupGen
DocsResourcesBlogUse CasesCompare
Log inConvert for Free
  1. MarkupGen
  2. /Compare
  3. /MarkupGen vs. Locofy: Web HTML/CSS vs. Web + Mobile Code
Back to comparisons

Published 2026-08-17 · By MarkupGen Team

MarkupGen vs. Locofy: Web HTML/CSS vs. Web + Mobile Code

Locofy and MarkupGen solve the same starting problem — a Figma design that needs to become real code — but they're scoped differently. Locofy's pitch is breadth: web and mobile output from one design. MarkupGen's pitch is depth on the web side specifically: clean, semantic HTML/CSS with the widest choice of CSS output formats.

Quick answer: need code for a mobile app too, not just a website? Locofy is the one on this list that outputs React Native and Flutter alongside web frameworks. Building for the web and want clean HTML, CSS or Tailwind without a token-metered pricing model? MarkupGen is the more direct fit.

What Locofy does well

Locofy uses what it calls a Large Design Model — proprietary models trained on a large set of designs — to convert Figma (or Adobe XD) files into code. It runs in two modes: Lightning, a one-click AI conversion, and Classic, a step-by-step flow with manual component tagging for more control. Framework coverage is broad: React, Next.js, Gatsby and HTML/CSS for the web, plus React Native and Flutter for mobile — which makes it one of the few tools in this space that isn't web-only.

That mobile coverage is the real differentiator. If a project needs both a web build and a native mobile app from the same Figma source, Locofy is built around exactly that case in a way most Figma-to-code tools aren't.

What MarkupGen does differently

MarkupGen doesn't try to cover mobile frameworks — it's built specifically for the web, and goes deep there instead of wide. Export a frame with the Figma plugin, AI generates HTML, CSS and optionally React from the design's actual structure, refine visually in an in-app editor, then export in one of six CSS formats: Vanilla CSS, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap, Bulma, Materialize or Pico CSS.

Auto Layout maps straight to Flexbox, responsive breakpoints are generated from the design's own resizing constraints, and every export gets an automatic quality score. Because the scope stays web-only, pricing stays a flat plan rather than a usage-metered token/credit system — which matters if you'd rather budget a fixed monthly cost than track consumption per conversion.

Where each one fits

Locofy MarkupGen
Web frameworks React, Next.js, Gatsby, HTML/CSS Vanilla HTML/CSS, Tailwind, Bootstrap, Bulma, Materialize, Pico, React
Mobile output React Native, Flutter — (web-only)
Conversion modes Lightning (AI) or Classic (manual tagging) AI generation + in-app visual editor
Pricing model PAYG token-based or annual plans Flat plan tiers, free plan included

If a mobile app is part of the deliverable, Locofy's React Native/Flutter output covers ground MarkupGen doesn't try to. If the project is web-only and you want clean HTML/CSS/Tailwind with predictable pricing, start with MarkupGen's free plan and compare the output directly against your own Figma frame.

See how MarkupGen stacks up against the rest of the field in Best Figma to Code Tools in 2026.

Try it with Figma to HTML

Related reading

Compare

MarkupGen vs. TeleportHQ: Converter vs. Low-Code Platform

TeleportHQ pairs Figma-to-code export with a built-in CMS, forms and hosting; MarkupGen stays focused on clean, standalone HTML/CSS/React output.

Read more
Compare

MarkupGen vs. Framer: Code Export vs. Hosted Website Builder

Framer turns a Figma import into a hosted website with no native code export; MarkupGen exports standalone HTML, CSS or React that you own and host anywhere.

Read more
Compare

Best Figma to Code Tools in 2026: An Honest Comparison

A fair, no-fluff comparison of Figma-to-code tools — MarkupGen, Anima, Locofy, Builder.io, TeleportHQ, Framer and Figma Dev Mode — pick the right fit.

Read more
Compare

MarkupGen vs. Builder.io: Standalone Converter vs. Platform Plugin

Builder.io's Visual Copilot maps Figma to your existing codebase inside a larger CMS platform; MarkupGen is a standalone Figma-to-HTML/CSS converter.

Read more
Compare

MarkupGen vs. Anima: Which Figma-to-Code Tool Fits Your Workflow?

Anima has grown into a broader AI app-builder platform; MarkupGen stays focused on turning a Figma frame into clean HTML, CSS or Tailwind.

Read more
Compare

MarkupGen vs. Manual Coding: Figma to HTML

A fair comparison of hand-coding Figma designs versus using MarkupGen, so you can pick the right approach for your next project.

Read more
MarkupGen Explained: The AI Figma-to-Code PlatformBlog

MarkupGen Explained: The AI Figma-to-Code Platform

MarkupGen turns Figma designs into clean, production-ready HTML, CSS and React code through a simple, AI-powered four-step workflow.

Read more
MarkupGen for Agencies & FreelancersUse Cases

MarkupGen for Agencies & Freelancers

Turn approved Figma designs into client-ready HTML, CSS or React faster, with each project kept private to your workspace.

Read more
MarkupGenMarkupGen© 2025 MarkupGen. All rights reserved.
BlogUse CasesCompareResources
AboutDocumentationPrivacyTermsContact